JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 15, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Conce Serrano Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por presentación extemporánea
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-305/17.

Teniendo en cuenta que se verificó que la petición se formuló de manera extemporánea, la Sala considera que no es posible continuar con su estudio y, por el contrario, que debe RECHAZARLA sin lugar a efectuar pronunciamiento alguno sobre los demás presupuestos formales y materiales de procedencia de las solicitudes de nulidad contra providencias proferidas con ocasión de un trámite de revisión de la Corte Constitucional.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por extemporánea la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-305 de 2017, formulada por los señores Juan Carlos Conde Serrano y Luis Giovanni Sánchez Córdoba, magistrados de la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Cúcuta.
  2. SEGUNDO. INFORMAR que contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.